The second paper yielding from the European urban questionnaire survey has been published in
Basic and Applied Ecology, by Jussi Lampinen et al. Many thanks to Jussi Lampinen, Valentin Klaus, Leonie Fischer, Lena Neuenkamp and all the colleagues for this wonderful paper!
Lampinen, J., Tuomi, M.,
Fischer, L.K., Neuenkamp L., Alday, J.G., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Čeplová, N.,
Deák, B., Eriksson, O., Escriche, A.M., Fellowes, M.D.E., Fernández De Manuel,
B., Filibeck, G., González-Guzmán, A., Hinojosa, M.B., Kowarik, I., Lampei Bucharová,
A., Lumbierres, B., Pardo i Martín, R., Pons, X., Rodríguez-García, E.,
Schröder, R., Tatay, L.C., Unterweger, P., Valkó, O., Vázquez Manzanares, V.M.,
Klaus, V.H. (2020): Acceptance of near-natural greenspace management relates to
ecological and socio-cultural assigned values among European urbanites. Basic
and Applied Ecology (in press) [IF2019: 3.156]
The final paper will be soon available in the Journal webpage, until then, you can access the pre-proof version from here.
Urban greenspaces are important places for people living in cities, as these places provide our everyday contact with nature. In this European-scale study we were interested whether urban citizens accept near-natural greenspace managements, and what ecological and socio-cultural values are assinged to them accross Europe.
Abstract
Grasslands
are widespread elements of urban greenspace providing recreational,
psychological and aesthetic benefits to city residents. Two urban
grassland types of contrasting management dominate urban greenspaces:
frequently mown, species-poor short-cut lawns and less intensively
managed, near-natural tall-grass meadows. The higher conservation value
of tall-grass meadows makes management interventions such as converting
short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows a promising tool for urban
biodiversity conservation. The societal success of such interventions,
however, depends on identifying the values urban residents assign to
different types of urban grasslands, and how these values translate to
attitudes towards greenspace management. Using 2027 questionnaires
across 19 European cities, we identify the assigned values that
correlate with people's personal greenspace use and their preferences
for different types of urban grasslands to determine how these values
relate to the agreement with a scenario of converting 50% of their
cities’ short-cut lawns into tall-grass meadows. We found that most
people assigned nature-related values, such as wildness, to tall-grass
meadows and utility-related values, such as recreation, to short-cut
lawns. Positive value associations of wildness and species richness with
tall-grass meadows, and social and nature-related greenspace
activities, positively correlated with agreeing to convert short-cut
lawns into tall-grass meadows. Conversely, disapproval of lawn
conversion correlated with positive value associations of cleanliness
and recreation potential with short-cut lawns. Here, people using
greenspaces for nature-related activities were outstandingly positive
about lawn conversion. The results show that the plurality of values
assigned to different types of urban grasslands should be considered in
urban greenspace planning. For example, tall-grass meadows could be
managed to also accommodate the values associated with short-cut lawns,
such as tidiness and recreation potential, to support their societal
acceptance.
|
The two main types of urban grasslands: tall-grass meadows and short-cut lawns.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment